[Skip back to November 1999 /
Return to Boardroom index /
Skip ahead to January 2000]
Subj: BoardRoom: Where's Jeff?
From: lucre@penis.com ($nickerdoodle $clark)
Time: Thu, 02-Dec-1999 20:29:49 GMT IP: 128.255.110.230
Jeepers, I hope Jeff Goode's okay. The order hasn't been updated
for weeks and neither have new scripts been entered. I hope
nothing bad happened to our friendly webmaster.
Subj: BoardRoom: re: Where's Jeff?
From: cokiishi@hotmail.com (Christopher)
Time: Thu, 02-Dec-1999 21:11:19 GMT IP: 209.56.125.162
I, too, have been concerned!!
Jeff, where are you? Are you well??
PS--The BONS meeting was last night, lasting in the the wee and
then not so wee hours of the morning. An arduous task, but
brought home the oft-mentioned, but still-bears-repeating fact
that this was a stellar semester, with many fine pieces. If a
particular favorite of yours was not amoung the selected, I can
honestly say it was not for lack of individual merit, just that
the pool was heavy with talent. Congrats to all contributors and
performers.
Subj: BoardRoom: re: Where's Jeff?
From: jeffgoode@aol.com (Jeff)
Time: Sat, 04-Dec-1999 08:18:54 GMT IP: 152.173.91.31
Rats! I didn't think anyone would miss me.
I've been off to New York to see Poona the Fuckdog. But I think I'm back now.
...Jeff
Subj: BoardRoom: BEST OF ORDER
From: cokiishi@hotmail.com (Christopher)
Time: Sat, 04-Dec-1999 17:11:29 GMT IP: 205.217.148.147
Here we go! The best of order!!! Congrats to all!!!!!
Best Of No Shame Fall 1999
1. A Butter Beetle Battle by Mike Cassady and Aaron Galbraith
or Aaron Galbraith or Mike Cassady
2. Over the River and Through the Woods by Christopher Okiishi
2.5 Donkypunch by Mike Rothschild
3. Six Angry Sketches by Mark Hansen
4. The American Dream in One Calorie by Kyle Lange
4.5 A Song by Ben Schmidt
5. Fose Fatfard vs. A Dead Bee by Brad Smith
6. Get Down on Your Fucking Knees, You Miserable Wrenches, For
I Bring You Theatre by James Erwin
7. The Kiss by Willie Barbour
8. A Friendship So Deep by Balls Campbell
9. According to David Harman, This Monologue is All About Sex
by Adam Hahn
9.5 Mimicry Is the Most Sincere Form of Parody (part 3 of pi):
it was the best of times, it was the bratwurst of times by
Heyzeus Cantalopay Horak del Cantabria
10. Dental Dam Over Good Taste by Chris Stangl
10.5 No-Shame Coup D'etat, or, A Victory Clutched in the Snatch
of Defeat by Nick Clark
11. Whip It Good. Well? Good. Well, Good. By Aprille Clarke
12. It's Raining Patti LuPone or Three Odes by Mike Rothschild
13. The Greatest Collaboration Since Van Gogh and Insanity by
Mike "Cock" Cassady and Neil "Balls" Campbell
14. Mose Hayward Loves to Laugh by Jamal River
14.5 Foonca Feteria, Forest Firebest Friend by Arlen Lawson
15. Brett Deckers: Highly Excellent by Dan Brooks
Authors: Please remember to bring a LIGHT BOOTH COPY of your
piece to Best Of, in the which you carefully and BOLDLY declare
your lighting cues. This avoids any potential confusion with
order and exact directions (the light booth opperator may NOT be
the one who worked the night of your piece, and many of the
above are heavy light-utilizers.)
EVERYONE: Thank you all for a great semester. If last night
was any indication, we have some interesting directions to go in
the future. Order from last night will be posted once a couple
of details get worked out. Thank you in advance for your
patience.
Subj: BoardRoom: last night's show and everything in it.
From: lucre@penis.com ($nick)
Time: Sun, 05-Dec-1999 15:03:23 GMT IP: 128.255.56.5
I can't remember the whole show, but here's what I can recall.
1. Eggman on Gilligan: Loved the second part, but of course wouldn't have gotten it if not for the
first part. And the first part was durn funny too.
2. Zach Robertson is Jesus: Way too moralistic and prosthletizing (sp)to be fun for me. Scary
'cause it really did convince me mr. Robertson thought he was Jesus.
3. Me forgetting the Yul Brynner monologue. Sorry. It relly was a cool monologue, or it would
have been. Oh well, it's only "dead week".
4. Arlen cauget her in the rye, but then wasn't sure who she was. in the rye: Hooray for this song
being really good and not making me look like a complete idiot for endorsing it. Nifty lyrics and
good playing.
?. Later on Aprille Played a song too. It was very funny and catchy. Hooray for songs.
?. Still later Ben played a song and it was GRRreat! Hooray for Ben. He should have a contract
with a major label by now.
?. At some point James Erwin told the story of the monkey who tore the glass tube off his penis.
YEEEOUCH! I think more NS pieces should be historical. And also, Aaron should play a
masturbating monkey in everybody's piece ever.
?. At some point Mike C. made the interrupting mute joke, which was good. But I don't
remember the part of the piece I'm supposed to remember.
?. Jamal's Worst Thing Ever was so good I could masturbate 'till the glass tube came off. Every
piece should have Aaron as Masturbating monkey, and Adam and James as the crying chorus.
?. Newbies Kant skitch: Hooray for new folks. Hooray for female folks. Hooray for a piece
which is really damn funny.
?. John Hague's wierd pop culture thing: Like 'Schitzopolis' only not quite as good. But then,
what could be? This was definitely more deserving of its place in the order than was me
forgetting an entire mono.
?. Newbie on thanksgiving with dad: Funny and intensely disturbing because I beleive it.
?. K. A. Lane's Mono: A good bit and well written, but the accent seemed to switch on and off
several times during the piece, and the miming didn't work for me.
?. Jonathan Sawyer's Apology: My favorite of Mr. Sawyer's pieces all semester. The entrance
was fabulous, the apology believable and touching, the death scene hilarious. "Jesus Christ!"
14. Chris Stangl's Houdini Virus: Simply put, the best piece of
theatre EVER. Even if it was real it was the best piece of theatre EVER. That's fifteen. I'm
going to assume I got 'em all.
Subj: BoardRoom: re: last night's show and everything in
From: lucre@penis.com (Nikkoli Klarkovich)
Time: Sun, 05-Dec-1999 20:13:02 GMT IP: 128.255.56.5
Of all things who'd ha' thunk I forgot Malamuteamalarkarkamatarkamalkarpikumupikartikulous
Hansen playing the C scale on the Harmolodikka? Wait, maybe it's just a melodica, Harmelodic
being Ornette Coleman's group and I doubt they named that thing after Ornette Coleman's group.
Anyhow, it was the best of all the songs played that night and perfection in Dead Week material.
Also number 15. Dan's piece was the besty bestest ever. More people should do pieces like that.
Subj: BoardRoom: O what a tangled Web we weave
From: noshth@aol.com (Jeff)
Time: Sun, 05-Dec-1999 18:54:31 GMT IP: 171.211.41.52
I think the website is caught up now. If you recently sent something to be posted and it is NOT
on the site yet, please let me know.
...Jeff
Subj: BoardRoom: ...when we practice to deceive!
From: cokiishi@hotmail.com (Christopher)
Time: Mon, 06-Dec-1999 22:16:30 GMT IP: 209.56.125.166
The Order for 12/3/99, as best I can get it.
1. Joseph A. Burton is a Liar/Joseph A. Burton is a Thief by
Adam Hahn
2. I Left Jesus in My Other Pants by Sachar "Keeper of the
Hamster" Robertson
3. Santa Claus is a Prick Part 3: The Yul Brynner Monologue by
Nick Clark
4. [Arlen re-titled his piece and didn't change it on his
script, so he'll have to fill us in...] by Arlen Lawson
4.5 Melodica Monologua by Mark J. Hansen
5. Ken's [not sure on that name. A little help, James? ]
Adventure by James Erwin
6. The Key to Happiness is at the End of the Chorus by Aprille
Clarke
7. The First Thing I've Done by Jessica Ahrendt
8. The Worst Thing Ever by Jamal River
9. Coming Clean by Jonathan Sawyer
10. I've Always Been Close To You by Kehry Anson Lane
10.5 Joseph A. Burton Must Die/Joseph A. Burton is One of the
Nicest People I Know by Adam Hahn
11. Girls Who Crave Kant by Allison McCabe and Merideth Nepstad
12. An Existential Love Story, or We got Stoned! by John Hague
and Peter Rugg
13.5 Titles Are For Pussies by Mike Cassady and Neil "Balls"
Campbell
14. The Houdini Virus slight of hand by Chris Stangl
15. Big Angry by Dan Brooks (not actually performed, for reasons
obvious to all present)
Good night, especially given that it was Dead Week. In
particular, nice to see a bunch of new, solid performers! The
fact that they were all women should be incidental, but, as you
all know, sadly is not. In particular, the "Kant" piece, whice
was as perfect a No Shame piece as perfect can be. I'm
salivating for what they will do next!!
Subj: BoardRoom: partial review
From: JerkyPnut@aol.com (Egg)
Time: Mon, 06-Dec-1999 23:24:05 GMT IP: 205.188.192.187
Things I wanna say: (if I left out your piece, that means I
enjoyed it but don't have any comments to make)
1. Joseph A. Burton is a Liar/Joseph A. Burton is a Thief by
Adam Hahn
Good thing I was looking down into my notebook, I had a Hell of a
time keeping a straight face while talking about being arroused
by a coconut
10.5 Joseph A. Burton Must Die/Joseph A. Burton is One of the
Nicest People I Know by Adam Hahn
I'd like to thank Joseph A. Burton for being such a good sport
about my titles.
I would also like to curse him for being a liar and a thief.
2. I Left Jesus in My Other Pants by Sachar "Keeper of the
Hamster" Robertson
He is my friend, and I must defend his honor by telling the world
his name is Zachary, not Sachar.
Please refrain from such mockery of my Funk Soul Brother.
5. Ken's [not sure on that name. A little help, James? ]
Adventure by James Erwin
Wasn't his name Ham?
The "Fuck You, Monkey" line at the end of my piece didn't exist
until it suddenly came to me as I watched Aaron masturbate.
Thanks.
7. The First Thing I've Done by Jessica Ahrendt
Great to feed on new blood. Good piece, but a little unpolished,
part of me would have loved to go over with a red pen.
(sometimes, pieces touch me in such a way that I have an
uncontrollable urge to rewrite them- that's my problem, not
yours)
9. Coming Clean by Jonathan Sawyer
Part of me cheered, part of me was jeered. For the first time in
maybe a month, I'm really interested in what Al does next. I've
been waiting for a less-angry Angel.
10. I've Always Been Close To You by Kehry Anson Lane
I liked for two reasons- it was different from everything else
that night, and it made me sad.
11. Girls Who Crave Kant by Allison McCabe and Merideth Nepstad
They'd been sitting on this script for a month or two, trying to
get the courage to perform. I think we can all agree they had
nothing to worry about.
They were nervous, I was nervous for them- then they performed
and I just wished I could write like that.
14. The Houdini Virus slight of hand by Chris Stangl/15. Big
Angry by Dan Brooks
Very believable. I didn't really enjoy it at the time, but I
appreciate it more with every passing day.
Also, this was a night for much music, much kissing, and much fun
nonsense. And much fun in gen
Subj: BoardRoom: The 12/3 show - my first review
From: prplecow@interl.net (Zachary Robertson)
Time: Tue, 07-Dec-1999 00:05:07 GMT IP: 208.145.207.50
I DO have a review of the 12/3 show, but I would like to make
several comments before I get to that.
First, I would like to say that I enjoy the experience of No
Shame greatly. I first performed in 1997 (it was a piece about
an exploding hamster - look it up in the archives if you want)
and I caught the bug. However, my return to No Shame would be
delayed until just this year, Fall of 1999... it is good to be
back. I have to thank Adam Hahn for bringing me back. So
thanks you rat bastard.
Second, I offer my congrats to the aformentioned Mr. "Egg" Hahn
for making the Best Of No Shame. Don't get me wrong, I offer my
congrats to the rest of you who made it... I just happen to know
Hahn better than the rest of you. That can all change if you
want...
Now, to my own take on the show:
1. Joseph A Burton is a liar/Jospeh A Burton is a thief by Adam
Hahn - good piece, I enjoyed it a lot. Though I think it was
more Adam appeasing a No Shame audience than Adam being Adam.
But hell, I love 'em anyway.
2. I Left Jesus In My Other Pants by Zachary Robertson - this is
my own, and don't feel right about giving it a review. I do
know that the title got a good laugh, and that I rushed through
the piece faster than I had intended. Oh, and to the lone voice
(I think it was Mr Burton, but correct me if I am wrong)who gave
me the "Hell Yeah!" the first time I called for it... bless you
child. Bless you.
5. Ken's Adventure by James Erwin - My mother always told me
that masturbating monkeys are dangerous. Congrats, you proved
it. Aaron, however, as the monkey looked like he was getting a
bit winded. I guess one has to be in good shape to play a
masturbating space monkey.
6. The Key to Happiness... by Aprille Clarke - Any tune where I
can sing along and keep the beat MUST kick ass. And this one
did too.
7. The First Thing I Have Done by Jessica Ahrendt - For your
first I thought the writing was great. I had trouble hearing
you however, maybe it is me being deaf... but... volume up a
tiny bit.
9. Coming Clean by Jonathan Sawyer - Wow. Am I ever sorry for
taking your chair the first time I performed this year. Wow.
10.5 Jospeh A Burton Must Die/Joseph A Burton Is One Of The
Nicest People I Know - I'm giving you a coconut for Christmas,
you know that don't you. I loved the ad-lib monkeyline at the
end.
11. Girls Who Crave Kant by Allison McCabe and Merideth Nepstad -
Even though they told me in the lounge that they do not remember
me from previous encounters I forgive them. Damn good piece if
you don't know them... better piece if you do. But how am I
supposed to judge LD now with a straight face?
14. The Houdini Virus by Chris Stangl - um... er... ahh... Okay,
I just had to make sure I was the victim of a Kaufmann type
joke. I was worried for a moment. I think it was a good ending
for "Dead Week"
Thanks for tuning in.
Zachary
Subj: BoardRoom: nick in BONS!!??!!??!!??
From: lucre@penis.com (I'm not sure if...)
Time: Tue, 07-Dec-1999 02:28:16 GMT IP: 128.255.111.26
I'm not sure if Cassady, Sosa and Horak are aware of this or not,
but I very seriously would give up my slot in the order AND bake
each of them a pie AND eat fresh dog turds (can you guess which
two are sincere?) if they would grace my ears with "More Singing,
More Happiness" once again.
Subj: BoardRoom: ERRORS!!
From: cokiishi@hotmail.com (christopher)
Time: Tue, 07-Dec-1999 02:58:30 GMT IP: 205.217.148.144
:2. I Left Jesus in My Other Pants by Sachar "Keeper of the
:Hamster" Robertson
Whoops!! Should be "Zachary" nor "Sachar." Sorry...
:5. Ken's [not sure on that name. A little help, James? ]
:Adventure by James Erwin
Not Ken, but "Ham"--sorry again...
Subj: BoardRoom: (no subject)
From: lucre@penis.com (Interupting mute)
Time: Tue, 07-Dec-1999 04:02:18 GMT IP: 128.255.56.5
:
:
:
:2. I Left Jesus in My Other Pants by Sachar "Keeper of the
:
:Hamster" Robertson
:
:
Whoops!! Should be "Zachary" nor "Sachar." Sorry...
:
:
:
:5. Ken's [not sure on that name. A little help, James? ]
:
:Adventure by James Erwin
:
:
:
Not Ken, but "Ham"--sorry again...
:
:
Also, as I recall, Arlen's piece was entitle
"Catcher in the Rye? I Don't Even Know 'er in the Rye."!"
Subj: BoardRoom: Actual order...with corrections.
From: cokiishi@hotmail.com (Christopher)
Time: Tue, 07-Dec-1999 17:36:31 GMT IP: 129.255.164.120
The Order for 12/3/99, as complete as I can get it.
1. Joseph A. Burton is a Liar/Joseph A. Burton is a Thief by
Adam Hahn
2. I Left Jesus in My Other Pants by Zachary "Keeper of the
Hamster" Robertson
3. Santa Claus is a Prick Part 3: The Yul Brynner Monologue by
Nick Clark
4. Catcher in the Rye? I Didn't Even Know Her in the Rye by
Arlen Lawson
4.5 Melodica Monologua by Mark J. Hansen
5. Ham's Adventure; A Tale of Outer Space and Masturbation by
James Erwin
6. The Key to Happiness is at the End of the Chorus by Aprille
Clarke
7. The First Thing I've Done by Jessica Ahrendt
8. The Worst Thing Ever by Jamal River
9. Coming Clean by Jonathan Sawyer
10. I've Always Been Close To You by Kehry Anson Lane
10.5 Joseph A. Burton Must Die/Joseph A. Burton is One of the
Nicest People I Know by Adam Hahn
11. Girls Who Crave Kant by Allison McCabe and Merideth Nepstad
12. An Existential Love Story, or We got Stoned! by John Hague
and Peter Rugg
13.5 Titles Are For Pussies by Mike Cassady and Neil "Balls"
Campbell
14. The Houdini Virus slight of hand by Chris Stangl
15. Big Angry by Dan Brooks (not actually performed, for reasons
obvious to all present)
Sorry to all concerned...
Subj: BoardRoom: Who made the most fart? You did.
From: frackledart@hotmail.com (Jamal)
Time: Tue, 07-Dec-1999 19:12:09 GMT IP: 209.56.60.2
Yay for the new people. I quite enjoyed the Thanksgiving
monologue, as well as the Kant piece. Hooray for some new people
who also happened to be good.
(Hooray for the rest of you too, I guess, but you all already
think you're hot shit, so you don't need my encouragement.)
Subj: BoardRoom: re: BEST OF ORDER
From: cstangl@blue.weeg.uiowa.edu (Saucy Jack Stangl)
Time: Wed, 08-Dec-1999 22:22:53 GMT IP: 205.217.148.192
:Best Of No Shame Fall 1999
:2. Over the River and Through the Woods by Christopher Okiishi
:4. The American Dream in One Calorie by Kyle Lange
:4.5 A Song by Ben Schmidt
:6. Get Down on Your Fucking Knees, You Miserable Wrenches, For
: I Bring You Theatre by James Erwin
:7. The Kiss by Willie Barbour
:9. According to David Harman, This Monologue is All About Sex
: by Adam Hahn
:10. Dental Dam Over Good Taste by Chris Stangl
:10.5 No-Shame Coup D'etat, or, A Victory Clutched in the Snatch
:of Defeat by Nick Clark
:12. It's Raining Patti LuPone or Three Odes by Mike Rothschild
:14. Mose Hayward Loves to Laugh by Jamal River
:15. Brett Deckers: Highly Excellent by Dan Brooks
HAYZEUS KRE-STAY! The above are ALL monologues. Except "I
Wanna Go Down On You," which is a one-man song and "Over the
River," which is two intertwined monologues, and "Three Odes" is
poems, but they're still in monologue-mode. Remembering that
Horak's piece and "Donkeypunch" are ten seconds each, that's only
four "full length" sketches all BONS-evening! I like monologues
and all, but that's, uh, a lot of monologues.
Probably this was done because "Fose Fatford" makes
everything else look obsolete.
I'm voting "Wost Thing Ever" for Spring!
-Chris the Ripper
Subj: BoardRoom: Title
From: lemminger@hotmail.com (Doc Arlen)
Time: Wed, 08-Dec-1999 22:48:44 GMT IP: 24.4.252.113
"Catcher in the Rye? I hardly know 'er in the rye!"
A song by Arlen Lawson
A song that wasn't as funny as a few people seemed to think it
was. In fact, not funny at all. Not supposed to be funny, even.
Subj: BoardRoom: re: ERRORS!!
From: prplecow@interl.net (Zachary Sachar Rob)
Time: Thu, 09-Dec-1999 01:34:29 GMT IP: 208.145.207.50
It happens, at least you care enough to fix it.
-Z
:2. I Left Jesus in My Other Pants by Sachar "Keeper of the
:
:Hamster" Robertson
:
:
Whoops!! Should be "Zachary" nor "Sachar." Sorry...
:
:
:
:5. Ken's [not sure on that name. A little help, James? ]
:
:Adventure by James Erwin
:
:
:
Not Ken, but "Ham"--sorry again...
Subj: BoardRoom: re: ERRORS!!
From: prplecow@interl.net (Zachary Sachar Rob)
Time: Thu, 09-Dec-1999 01:34:29 GMT IP: 208.145.207.50
It happens, at least you care enough to fix it.
-Z
:2. I Left Jesus in My Other Pants by Sachar "Keeper of the
:
:Hamster" Robertson
:
:
Whoops!! Should be "Zachary" nor "Sachar." Sorry...
:
:
:
:5. Ken's [not sure on that name. A little help, James? ]
:
:Adventure by James Erwin
:
:
:
Not Ken, but "Ham"--sorry again...
Subj: BoardRoom: re: BEST OF ORDER
From: eddie@uiowa.edu (Eddie)
Time: Fri, 10-Dec-1999 06:19:05 GMT IP: 205.217.148.187
::Best Of No Shame Fall 1999
:
HAYZEUS KRE-STAY! The above are ALL monologues. Except "I
:Wanna Go Down On You," which is a one-man song and "Over the
:River," which is two intertwined monologues, and "Three Odes" is
:poems, but they're still in monologue-mode. Remembering that
:Horak's piece and "Donkeypunch" are ten seconds each, that's only
:four "full length" sketches all BONS-evening! I like monologues
:and all, but that's, uh, a lot of monologues.
: Probably this was done because "Fose Fatford" makes
:everything else look obsolete.
: I'm voting "Wost Thing Ever" for Spring!
: -Chris the Ripper
:
Ahem. "Whip it Good. Well? Good. Well, good." full-length,
non-monologue sketch. in best of. that is all.
Subj: BoardRoom: re: BEST OF ORDER
From: lucre@penis.com (nietzsche clarkzsthc)
Time: Sat, 11-Dec-1999 00:25:29 GMT IP: 128.255.56.5
:poems, but they're still in monologue-mode. Remembering that
:
:Horak's piece and "Donkeypunch" are ten seconds each, that's only
:
:four "full length" sketches all BONS-evening! I like monologues
:
:and all, but that's, uh, a lot of monologues.
:
: Probably this was done because "Fose Fatford" makes
:
:everything else look obsolete.
:
: I'm voting "Wost Thing Ever" for Spring!
:
: -Chris the Ripper
Ahem. "Whip it Good. Well? Good. Well, good." full-length,
non-monologue sketch. in best of. that is all.
but why do YOU mention
it? Chris Says there are four of them. I haven't counted myself, but I wouldn't presume that that
was the one he forgot if there were in fact five. When he says "the above" in case you hadn't
noticed, he does not reproduce the entire bons order. why do people feel the need to correct
things they haven't thoroughly examined?
Subj: BoardRoom: yo Jamal
From: adam@avalon.net (Adam Burton)
Time: Sat, 11-Dec-1999 20:03:04 GMT IP: 24.4.252.113
Hey! This is the second time I've gone to a Best Of all wantin'
to see a particular piece of yours, and then have not gotten to
see it 'cause you did something else... I guess there's
something to be said for bucking the system, but I missed the
piece they selected when it was first performed, and thought I
was gonna get a second chance.. I heard it was reeal good.
Subj: BoardRoom: re: yo Jml (BONSucks!)
From: cstangl@blue.weeg.uiowa.edu (Chris Lee Buttalo)
Time: Sun, 12-Dec-1999 02:28:12 GMT IP: 205.217.148.186
:Hey! you did something else...
I sympathize with both you and Jamal. There's something
discomforting about Best Of, where everyone on stage has to
balance that smug feeling that they're THE BEST, that they were
selected because they did something superior, and the reprise
often has a smarmy tinge to it. I assume this is partly what J.R.
is trying to circumvent.
Fose Hayward pointed out that BONS also sacrifices the "raw"
and "unpredictable" in the unofficial mission statement. Jamal's
"Popeye" skit, I think, was about on par with the "real" "MH
Loves To Laugh," and reenstated the lamented unpredictability...
and rawness, since we barely rehearsed it.
However... that the surprise is missing doesn't mean there's
no other way to love the jokes. But it's a different fun. A fun
of anticipating the expected, or wanting to study how someone
does a particularly difficult or elegant maneuver- I still think
Buster Keaton falling on his ass is funny, though I may've seen
the pratfall 20 times before.
Blah blah I talk too much. And I'm cranky because Dan didn't
do "Life."
-Your best friend in the universe,
Chris Stand in the place where you pee
Subj: BoardRoom: what's the deal?
From: goddess_0423@hotmail.com (itsa secret)
Time: Sun, 12-Dec-1999 06:35:07 GMT IP: 152.163.207.59
is kyle lange single???
Subj: BoardRoom: re: what's the deal?
From: Sorry@BubbleBurster.com (So sorry)
Time: Sun, 12-Dec-1999 09:01:47 GMT IP: 205.188.200.51
:is kyle lange single???
Sorry...I don't mean to burst your bubble, but haven't you seen
the ring he wears? He's practically married. I thought it was
obvious.
PS - we all love him as much as you do... :
Subj: BoardRoom: wee
From: frackledart@hotmail.com (jamal river river ri)
Time: Sun, 12-Dec-1999 18:59:20 GMT IP: 205.217.148.201
Sheesh. You try to liven things up a little and what do you get?
You get Rothschild on ISCA sayin' "Your excitement surrounding
the upcoming (and totally funny) 'Foze Fatford' evacuated my
self of confidence, and a tiny bit of pee pee!" And you get Adam
lamenting the lack of the _real_ "Mose Hayward? He Loves A
Laugh!" Not that I can blame you, Adam. What a funny funny thing
it was! Ho! Not as funny as, say, Popeye! A sailor! But funny.
I'll give you a private screening sometime, Adam. I'll say, "Hey
Adam! Mose Hayward Loves A Laugh and it goes like this: 'I was
at a bar the other night, etc...'"
So anyway, I thought it was a pretty fun Best Of. That's what I
thought. I liked Brett Deckers better this time cuz it wasn't
surrounded by a bunch of other cum pieces. I liked Aprille's
piece quite a bit. I hadn't seen it. (Thank goodness SHE did
what she was supposed to, or I would have missed out on THAT
piece of fun!) I hadn't seen that Neil and Mike piece with Chris
as their star, either. That was funny. Fose Fatford and 3 Dead
Babies were just as fantastic as the 1st time around. Kyle as
the Cocaine machine in Egg's piece was really funny. I kept
looking at him through the sketch. His expression was bizarre.
And way... FUNNY! Everything else was funnier the 1st time
around, but still funny this time.
Fose Fatford 4 ever and ever. I love you, Fose!
Subj: BoardRoom: shut your collective pieholes
From: michael-rothschild@uiowa.edu (rothschild)
Time: Sun, 12-Dec-1999 20:30:50 GMT IP: 152.163.206.197
1. I think people would have to agree that people
shouting "FOSE! FOSE!" right before I'm about to get on stage
and do a piece is pretty fucking rude. It didn't make
me "nervous" or "scared" it just pissed me off, and threw off my
mindset to do "Donkeypunch"...that's why I took that long pause
at the start. It's really sad to think that some performers get
joy not out of doing their pieces but out of fucking up other
people. And Jamal, please don't put words in my mouth. I know
what I said.
2. I've always liked the idea of BONS. Take 15 or so of the best
pieces and do them again, as a representation of the best that
NS has to offer. I don't think, for me at least, there's any
pressure to perform "better" than I did before, because in
trying to perform "better" or more correctly, you just fuck
yourself in the end. But there's the challenge of doing a piece
before 3x as many people as before in a much more unforgiving
performance space. Also, I've always tweaked my BONS material
before I performed it again, usually making a few changes here
and there just to smooth out the rough edges or change things
that didn't work. I know the appeal of NS is that raw, rough
edged feel the pieces have, but I'm not going to perform a line
or bit a second time that I didn't like the first time.
3. Is Kyle single? What the fuck? Half the pieces he does are
about his girlfriend. I realize that somehow makes him more
appealing, in that crazy paradoxical way relationships work, but
seriously. Love ya Kyle, you crazy mechanic.
4. BONS was really good, by the way. I liked Egg's piece much
more the 2nd time, the same with Aprille's and especially Brett
Deckers. 6 Angry Sketches was really strong again too. I didn't
care for Fose Fatfard as much again (not because of the
chanting) and Mose Loves to Laugh fell flat for me. But, oh
well.
mike
Subj: BoardRoom: Michael Buttsmoth
From: frackledart@hotmail.com (Jamal Rothschild R)
Time: Mon, 13-Dec-1999 00:23:25 GMT IP: 205.217.148.202
Me and Mark Rothchibba are havin' a feud! We fight! It is
because we are angry at each other and their awful mouths!
Actually, Mikus, the Fose chant was not a specially designed
"Mess Up Mikey" device created specifically for the beginning of
your piece, but was what we yelled between probably a half dozen
skitches. So while it's level of obnoxious-ness may be
debatable, don't go feeling all puffy and self-important
thinking we singled out _your_ pre-skit blackness to shout at.
Smellus, Munka Robbchitta!
Subj: BoardRoom: Best?!?!?!?! Of?
From: lucre@penis.com ($nick $ux)
Time: Mon, 13-Dec-1999 02:34:02 GMT IP: 128.255.56.5
Nobody wants to hear me say this, but I detested Best Of. It was no fun for me to see a bunch of
skitches I had seen done more funly before. It was no fun to get into my underpants in front of
twice as many people in the tight little shallow space in front of the curtain. Even Fose rang a
little hollow the second time through. The addition of Balls helped, but not enough. Brett
Deckers, which I hadn't seen the first time, I had basically enough information about for it not to
be at all funny the second time. Six Angry sketches was by the one and only Marky-Mark and the
funky Hansen, yet it still was unsatisfying. The fact is that these skitches are written with B in
mind, and their first performances condition their actors to the B space and audience, and the
Maybe space nd audience is not one against which these pieces had a huge degree of staying
power. Best Of was literally the worst No Shame all semester.
As for Kyle being practically married and hot, that's the way things are for everyone. Single is not
sexy. You think "If s/he isn't good enough for anyone else in the world, how could s/he possibly
be good enough for me?" This is one of the myriad reasons I avoid seeking a "significant other" -
the only people I would want to date are happily monogomously entwined. This also is most of
the reason that nobody wants me for a significant other - they say "Yuch, he can't even get a date,
why should I give him one. Also he is ugly and smells bad. He is also fun to spit at. I hope he
dies before I do because my life is more important." That is what they say when the passing
thought of putting the moves on me flashes though their unprepared minds.
Later, they are prepared.
Subj: BoardRoom: re: Best?!?!?!?! Of?
From: jlerwin@hotmail.com (Erwin)
Time: Mon, 13-Dec-1999 03:05:48 GMT IP: 128.255.111.11
Single is not sexy. You think "If s/he
isn't good enough for anyone else in the world, how could s/he
possibly be good enough for me?" This is one of the myriad
reasons I avoid seeking a "significant other" - the only people I
would want to date are happily monogomously entwined. This also
is most of the reason that nobody wants me for a significant other
- they say "Yuch, he can't even get a date, why should I give him
one. Also he is ugly and smells bad. He is also fun to spit at.
I hope he dies before I do because my life is more important."
That is what they say when the passing thought of putting the
moves on me flashes though their unprepared minds.
Later, they are prepared.
Don't give up yet, Nick! Or you'll end up like me. When my dad was
my age, he was married, his wife was pregnant. A few months
previously, he had stopped fighting a war on the other side of the
world and drove around Texas in a mint '73 cherry Corvette. Me?
I'm typing words into a computer. If I'm lucky, tonight I'll get
home, rip some 80s songs to MP3, write a couple of entries for my
web site, and finish reading that book about the East India
Company. It's an empty shell of a life, Nick. So lonely...
James "barely has the strength now to keep typing" Erwin
Subj: BoardRoom: re: Best?!?!?!?! Of?
From: michael-rothschild@uiowa.edu (rothschild)
Time: Mon, 13-Dec-1999 04:56:55 GMT IP: 152.163.207.206
"The way to get laid is to TREAT THEM LIKE SHIT"-- David Mamet
I don't actually do that.
Jama;, I don't see this as a fued...I just think what was done
was really iritating and not cool to fellow artists and I wanted
to call that to your attention. Is all.
mike
Subj: BoardRoom: It Was The Best!
From: frackledart@hotmail.com (Jamal)
Time: Mon, 13-Dec-1999 17:34:41 GMT IP: 209.56.60.2
Jama;, I don't see this as a fued...I just think what was done
:
was really iritating and not cool to fellow artists and I wanted
:
to call that to your attention. Is all.
:
Apology accepted, sir! Friends till the end!!!!!!!!!
Nicko- even though I did enjoy BONS, I agree with you in spirit.
I'm not big on "Best Of"s on the whole. Seems like anything
with "best of" in front of the name is automatically gonna be
less than satisfying. Like, we all love the Smiths, right? Sure
we do! But do we like their Best Of CD's, volumes 1 and 2? No we
don't. And we all liked Tom Green before his show got bad, right?
Yeah! But did we enjoy "The Best Of Tom Green"? Not so much! Best
Ofs are always second rate, and No Shame Bests Ofs are no
exception. Er, that's what _I_ think. I am giving an opinion,
Nick. You are free to disagree with me. That is OK for you to not
like what I say. Don't feel bad because maybe you love Best Of
the most. You can like it all you want. You can want to have a
baby of it and no one is going to laugh because your opnion isn't
as good as theirs, Nicker. You are free. Free to be poop and pee.
-fose
Subj: BoardRoom: I don't like the Smiths much
From: jlerwin@hotmail.com (Erwin)
Time: Mon, 13-Dec-1999 19:15:31 GMT IP: 63.25.166.40
Jamal-
I must respectfully disagree with your stated opinion. Best Of
is not necessarily awful, although, yes, some Best ofs are
better than others. Sometimes, Best Of drags on with all the
empty pageantry and self-important pomp of the Oscars, but
sometimes, Best Of is truly magical. Take, for example, the
Best Of for last spring. That was, despite my having seen most
of the pieces already, easily in the top three nights of No
Shame I've seen ever. And as much as the idea of every No Shame
piece as a theatrical Tir Tairngir magically appearing once
every lifetime, filling the life of a lucky moor-bound peasant
with sublime paralyzing bliss, and then slipping unremembered
away into the curling Gaelic mists appeals to me romantically,
there are lots of NS pieces that deserve the widest possible
airing. Fose Fatfard, Sanford Meisner and Son, and the Language
of Brutality deserve not only Best of slots, but also to be
played over and over on broadcast television until everyone is
like us.
I think I lost track of what I was saying. It's got something to
do with my liking Best Of.
Jim "of Finland" Erwin
James Erwin "of the Clan MacErwin"
Erwinred the Unready
Subj: BoardRoom: shake your BONS BONS
From: michael-rothschild@uiowa.edu (rothschild)
Time: Mon, 13-Dec-1999 22:32:07 GMT IP: 128.255.107.107
I think BONS serves several useful purposes and has several
drawbacks, but the usefulness over-rides the drawbacks in my
opinion.
BONS works, as I said before, as a showing of the best NS has to
offer. NS gets a bad rap from some people (who usually haven't
been to it much). The rap is that it's a selfish, self-serving,
vulgar, inside joke filled night of lame theater shit. Which
sometimes it is. But there is also some beautiful, moving, funny,
shocking and fucking-with-the-Man stuff that comes out of it, and
BONS is a great way of showing that to us and to our audience.
Which leads to point b. Not that there was point a. but point b
is that BONS is sometimes the only night of NS people go to. NS
has a core audience of diehards who come nearly every week, have
favorite performers, favorite sketches and never, ever perform
themselves. that's fine, those people are the bread and butter of
NS. But there's also a fringe of people, who come maybe 2 or 3
times a year, only when there's no parties, bar hoping or fuck
fests going on. chances are, they will go to BONS. And maybe be
inspired by BONS to say "wow, that was really good. I should
go/perform/sleep with rothschild more". I look at BONS like a
hook to draw more audience/performers in. We show them the
best, so they want to see more. If the hook is shiny and has a
chunk of Alaskan smoked salmon on it, the hook will land its
target. If the hook is rusty and has a piece of rotten yam that
was recently taken out of the ass of an east villiage performance
artist named Krall, the fish (audience) will avoid it and go find
their pleasure somewhere else, usually orally.
Jesus God that was a long sentance.
Anyway, BONS is a way to show non regulars that NS always has
something worth seeing, therefore should be seen as much as
possible.
I also look at it as a reward to our audience for being cool, and
for us to have the balls (and ovaries) to do what we do.
In short: BONS is cool. yes, NS thrives on that "see it once and
never see it again" thrill. but, would I want to live the rest of
my life never seeing "Brett Deckers", "Fose fatfard (Hi Jamal!!)"
or "Have a fucking coke" again? hell no, dammit.
North dallas 40 Mike
Subj: BoardRoom: re: shake your BONS BONS
From: lucre@penis.com (Dingus Dollarsnick)
Time: Tue, 14-Dec-1999 05:15:12 GMT IP: 128.255.110.232
:In short: BONS is cool. yes, NS
thrives on that "see it once and
:never see it again" thrill. but,
would I want to live the rest of
:my life never seeing "Brett
Deckers", "Fose fatfard (Hi
Jamal!!)"
:or "Have a fucking coke" again?
hell no, dammit.
:
:North dallas 40 Mike
Granted I did WANT to see several
of those pieces again, but I felt
that the repeat performances
paled in comparison to their
forbears. I guess its better to
be able to say, "ah, seeing Fose
Fatfard vs. a Dead Bee a second
time was not nearly as much fun
as it should have been." than to
have to say "If only I could have
seen Fose again, my life would be
complete. My dog would still be
alive, my hair still blond, my
car still operational. Alas, I
must drag the shell of a being
that is myself through the days
which lie before me like a
yawning chasm knowing that I
never saw Fose a second time, and
never will. Oh cruel, cruel God,
why do you torture me so?" but
still, I can't say that I enjoyed
BONS as an event this semester
much at all. Hooray for the
Popeye thing being unexpected.
Also, Okiishi's car thing stood
up better than a lot of stuff and
Kyle as Coke machine was a fun
addition. Still...
Subj: BoardRoom: re: shake your boogers out you nose hole
From: frackledart@hotmail.com (Your friend)
Time: Tue, 14-Dec-1999 19:13:11 GMT IP: 209.56.60.2
Hooray for the
:
Popeye thing being unexpected.
:
I'm glad somebody appreciated that. Besides me.
...Not like I CARE. Not like I'm looking for approval from that
Man! A rebel such as I am? Don't make me laugh about that!
See, I'm what you might call "totally cool", or "rad". Keep your
attitude, buster, I have my own! (By which I mean a BAD attitude.
Like Jay-Z or Marilyn Monroe. We'll fuck you up quick! 2
times! ...Th-th-th-three times!)
-Flicka
Subj: BoardRoom: BONS rawked
From: fanky@avalon.net (Simmerin' Stan Calla)
Time: Tue, 14-Dec-1999 23:34:45 GMT IP: 205.217.148.174
That was an excellent, excellent Bons, and I have seen many.
I think, to be quite blunt, that the only reason Nick is whining
about it is that his piece (which wasn't that good in the first
place and probably only got selected on principle, but who knows)
went over poorly, and then some genius in the light booth cut him
off before he could stutteringly blather more pointless lecture
material at us that we didn't want to hear. There was only one
really low point to Bons this semester, and this was definitely
it. Talk about a piece that _really_ didn't work on the 2nd
trial....yick.
Now that that's out of the way, the goodies:
(Pardon my lack of knowledge of titles, I usually do better but
I'm too damned tired to research at present)
I didn't expect to, but I enjoyed the Flickety Hong Kong Phooey
piece more the 2nd time than the first. It didn't really strike
me as a masterpiece, but an excellent example of what No Shame is
about if a bit on the long side.
I really dug Mike and Neil's "All washed up" piece, reminded me
of some scenes in Hudsucker Proxy, and was tasty good. That's
energy for ya, mmm hmm.
Dead Babies was of course excellent, I really appreciated the
brief tongue wag this time (not sure if that was a new addition
or if I missed it the first time).
And my favorite of the semester was most delicious - the best
friends sketch with the 6th sense thingie and the child nazi
molestation. That's just inspired.
Subject change:
Doing a different piece than gets selected at BONS
I'm very down on that as a whole. The thing is, the board isn't
selecting performers, it's selecting pieces. When they put a
piece that you did in BONS, they're not saying "You, Bif Biafra
are the Best of No Shame!", they're saying your piece was
inducted. Sure, NS has a bit of its manifesto written by
breaking rules. But breaking some of them winds up appearing
egotistical and can be (as Adam pointed out) problematic. Not a
huge issue, just kinda annoying in my book.
-The G Man
Subj: BoardRoom: re: BONS rawked
From: lucre@penis.com (Lucrebaba$)
Time: Wed, 15-Dec-1999 09:04:53 GMT IP: 128.255.56.5
That was an excellent, excellent Bons, and I have seen many.
I think, to be quite blunt, that the only reason Nick is whining
about it is that his piece (which wasn't that good in the first
place and probably only got selected on principle, but who knows)
went over poorly, and then some genius in the light booth cut him
off before he could stutteringly blather more pointless lecture
material at us that we didn't want to hear. There was only one
really low point to Bons this semester, and this was definitely
it. Talk about a piece that _really_ didn't work on the 2nd
trial....yick.
I think, despite what I perhaps wrongly percieve as a sarcastic or playful tone in this post, there is
more than a little truth in it. I did not feel that my piece was terribly good. I hadn't looked
forward to doing it again. I never really even noticed how it went over. (the light cue was
scripted, btw). It is possible that I projected my grumpiness with this one onto the show as a
whole, but in fact I really do feel that, given the power - comedic and otherwise - of this semester,
BONS was neither an accurate report of the material, nor was it a synergetic, cohesive ball of fun
in its own right. Also, I don't know what principle it might have been selected on - if it was that I
showed up and did a piece fairly frequently, Al should have gotten a piece in, since he did pieces
more frequently than did I - but then Al should have gotten a piece in anyhow.
Without trying to trivialize the arduous task of selecting a BONS order, I think the board could
have done a better job selecting pieces. The only pieces that absolutely needed to be in, I felt,
were Fose and Ben's song. I would say Okiishi's bit as well, but he did several things as good or
better. Greatest Collaboration and A Friendship so deep would have worked if the confining
shallowness of the space hadn't been so confining and shallow. Also, you should have known that
any kind of insult would only incite me to more online blather. Shame on you.
Subj: BoardRoom: r: Theme from Rachel's BONS
From: cstangl@blue.weeg.uiowa.edu (Chrismuss Stangl)
Time: Wed, 15-Dec-1999 20:04:52 GMT IP: 205.217.148.177
:Dead Babies... appreciated the tongue wag this time (not sure if
:that was a new addition
New addition. It was inspired by Hayley Mills' seminal
performance in "Pollyanna," from whence I stole it. Other
mannerisms swiped from Pinocchio, my little sister Becky, and
Laura Dern in "Blue Velvet."
-Rev. Chris Stangl
Subj: BoardRoom: re: BONS rawked awful stench out my rum
From: frackledart@hotmail.com (Jamal)
Time: Wed, 15-Dec-1999 21:09:27 GMT IP: 209.56.60.2
NS has a bit of its manifesto written by
:
breaking rules. But breaking some of them winds up appearing
:
egotistical and can be (as Adam pointed out) problematic
Yeah, I can see how doing a difern't piece is kind of
egotistical. I don't know why I was so opposed to doing "Lovey to
Laugh" again, but I really didn't want to. There's something
particularly unpleasant to me about doing a monlogue twice. If
they'd picked that piece where Brooks stabs his poops with a coat
hanger, I'd have been all over doing that again. But anyways...
I feel I must defend Nick's piece. I think it was a good piece
and very funny the 1st time. It was a bad choice for BONS. It was
a one-time kind of thing and not at all a piece that should be
done twice. But it certainly wasn't "yick". I would have rather
seen Nick's "Where's the Love?" again. That mickey-fickey was
stuck in my head for days: "Here comes the love! That's not
enough! Here comes some love! There's a booger in Kate's butt! Oh
yeah! Yes!" Pure bliss.
-Jackmack
Subj: BoardRoom: Jamal River? Total fa
From: poop@fart.com (Heather MacCombafomb)
Time: Wed, 15-Dec-1999 21:11:28 GMT IP: 209.56.60.2
"out my rum"? That makes no sense, Jamal. You're a dumbass.
Subj: BoardRoom: re: BONS rawked
From: boggle@radiks.net (Kehry L)
Time: Thu, 16-Dec-1999 01:32:34 GMT IP: 206.29.242.170
:...and then some genius in the light booth cut him
:off before he could stutteringly blather more pointless lecture
:material at us that we didn't want to hear.
That genius was me, and the cue was scripted... k? mmm k
Subj: BoardRoom: stunningly executed
From: adam@avalon.net (Adam Burton)
Time: Thu, 16-Dec-1999 18:13:54 GMT IP: 128.255.95.154
:That genius was me, and the cue was scripted... k? mmm k
:
Kehry--I think that means you did it really well.
Subj: BoardRoom: re: stunningly executed
From: boggle@radiks.net (Kehry L)
Time: Thu, 16-Dec-1999 21:59:43 GMT IP: 206.153.216.182
::That genius was me, and the cue was scripted... k? mmm k
:
Kehry--I think that means you did it really well.
:
Oh... Pardon. It's very difficult to judge sarcasm (or lack of
it) in internet postings. If I was wrong in my interpretation, I
apologize to Mr. Stangl
Subj: BoardRoom: re: BONS
From: fanky@avalon.net (Fizzlin' Fran Callah)
Time: Fri, 17-Dec-1999 01:26:44 GMT IP: 205.217.148.207
I've got a flamin' tongue, what can I say.
Firstly, kudos, I had no idea the light blackout was scripted.
And yes, it was stunningly executed and I must give credit where
it's due - nice touch, nice timing, yesss. Ya got me.
As for "principle", I was thinking the piece was selected for Best
Of along the thinking lines of putting in something that attacks
the forum. Basically, No Shame showing that it's far from above
critique. But I don't think it shoulda been in thar, especially
for those of us who'd seen it before. Really not a 2nd timer. It
seemed like too large a buildup for the payoff the first time, but
maybe others had different mileage with dat.
And anyhoo, my ramblin's were meant in a largely playful manner,
always are. And also, I just thought Bons was most delicious, and
figured the negative reaction Nick had to it was stemming from
personal experience more than an actual lack of quality on stage.
-Grinch Mitchell
Subj: BoardRoom: re: BONS
From: bromarks@aol.com (markusss)
Time: Fri, 17-Dec-1999 19:18:55 GMT IP: 205.188.197.183
Hi Greg!!! How are you?
Subj: BoardRoom: Nick's Oh, so wonderful skit
From: CCCCarl@hotmail.com (Carl)
Time: Sat, 18-Dec-1999 10:28:59 GMT IP: 24.4.252.113
I missed that skit the first time around. I liked it. I
didn't get any sense that it wasn't received well.
I haven't read this forum in a bit and maybe I'm alone in
saying this, but Fuck you, Fanky. I hate you. I hate your
miserable guts. I like to eat your miserable guts, though. I
don't hate them so much that I don't like to eat them.
And, by the way, you will, likewise, have to excuse my
ramblings as they are also written in a playful manner, no
matter how needlessly hurtful they might appear on the surface.
I am Carl. Send hatemail, please.
Subj: BoardRoom: xmascheer
From: bromarks@aol.com (marky milk)
Time: Mon, 20-Dec-1999 20:03:32 GMT IP: 152.163.195.204
Hey! Here's some kinda cool
news!
I came home for ze 'olidays on Saturday, home being Des Moines,
the northern part, like Urbandale and such, and I was flipping
through this part of the Register from last Thursday's edition,
the Datebook, and I happened across a little notice about the
current plays around town. One of them was The Eight: Reindeer
Monologues, which was performed in two theatres, which now I
can't remember, except one was fairly new and was just up the
block from the Varsity, in the Drake area. For those who don't
know, this little play was written by our very own webmaster Jeff
Goode. So, expect a little royalty check, Jeff! Unfortunately, I
found out about this too late to actually see it, but I still
thought it was pretty neato.
Oh, you're quite welcome!
Subj: BoardRoom: re: xmascheer
From: Fretard@Stupid.com (I am NOT a criminal.)
Time: Tue, 21-Dec-1999 00:32:25 GMT IP: 204.246.221.203
: Hey! Here's some kinda cool
:
news!
:
I came home for ze 'olidays on Saturday, home being Des Moines,
:
the northern part, like Urbandale...
Urbandale? Ick. I was almost arrested in Urbandale. Not that
this has anything to do with Jeff's play. I'm sure the play is
magnificent. I just wanted to say that I hate Urbandale. So
there - I said it. Mark - you are cool, even though you live
there. Stay away from the cops, though. They're MEAN!
Subj: BoardRoom: Nate O'Leary-Roseberry
From: francis@shelton.com (Francis Shelton)
Time: Thu, 23-Dec-1999 06:52:06 GMT IP: 24.4.252.113
I've READ all these messages? What's WRONG with you people? Tell
me a thing for me to read!
Subj: BoardRoom: re: Nate O'Leary-Roseberry
From: bromarks@aol.com (markal)
Time: Fri, 24-Dec-1999 21:59:47 GMT IP: 152.163.197.73
:I've READ all these messages? What's WRONG with you people? Tell
:
me a thing for me to read!
That jon Stewart book is supposed to be good.
Subj: BoardRoom: re: Nate O'Leary-Roseberry
From: smooth-criminal@uiowa.edu (rothschild)
Time: Sun, 26-Dec-1999 07:39:44 GMT IP: 152.163.206.186
:I've READ all these messages? What's WRONG with you people? Tell
:me a thing for me to read!
Man On the Moon is very good. I saw it tonight.
Also, winter break sucks.
And I am cool.
Mike
Subj: BoardRoom: re: Nate O'Leary-Roseberry
From: bromarks@aol.com (arkmay)
Time: Mon, 27-Dec-1999 00:03:09 GMT IP: 205.188.199.174
Man On the Moon is very good. I saw it tonight.
:
:
Also, winter break sucks.
:
:
And I am cool.
Two of these three statements are true. One is false. It's p to you to decide, cuz I'm not telling.
P.S. I am cool, too.
Markamusssss
Subj: BoardRoom: re: Nate O'Leary-Roseberry
From: boggle@radiks.net (Kehry L)
Time: Mon, 27-Dec-1999 22:35:13 GMT IP: 208.154.158.209
:Man On the Moon is very good. I saw it tonight.
:Also, winter break sucks.
:And I am cool.
:Mike
WOW! I was very impressed with that movie as well. I think Jim
Carrey deserves best actor for his performance. Excellent film.
What about the Green Mile though? I thought it was an incredible
work as well. It's my guess for best picture.
K.A.L.
Subj: BoardRoom: Outside a Small Circle of Pee
From: cstangl@blue.weeg.uiowa.edu (Chris Spengler)
Time: Wed, 29-Dec-1999 18:57:41 GMT IP: 205.217.148.129
Here are my "complaints" about the "things" the last three people
"wrote" for Nate (mean) and Francis (nice) to read:
1) Markmus' statement that "that Jon Stewart book is supposed to
be good" was totally useless to young Francis (who'd asked for
something to read). Naturally Mr. Stewart set out with the
intention of writing a "good" book. Of course it was SUPPOSED to
be good. Duh, Mark. Duh.
2) Rothschildren's follow-up that "Man on the Moon," and himself
were good, but Winter Break "sucks" had several problems:
a) Neither "Man on the Moon" in the format to which Rothco
was refering nor Rothco himself are primarily "read," thus making
mincemeat of Mark Hansen's delicate joke (ie- Francisnate wanted
to "read" some posts here, but Markmus suggested a book for him
to "read"!!!!!)
b) Winter Break "sucking" is supposed to be a criticism,
presumably implying that Winter Break "sucks dick" or "sucks
penis" or "sucks penile-dick" or fellates him in some way. I
have personally found all the above to actually be enjoyable, not
negative at all, and endorse them fully.
3) Mr. Lane's "guess" that "The Green Mile" would win Best
Picture seems dubious to me. I do not care about the Academy
Awards, since I agree with not ONE Best Picture winner since
their creation ("Wings" over "The General"? Fuck that shit!), but
the Academy nearly invarably prefers historical epics for the
last thirty years, at the almost total exclusion of any other
genre from the Best Picture category. They could pull a weird
"Silence of the Lambs" choice this year, but it seems unlikely.
To me. And you, too. Even when they pick a comedy ("Forrest
Gump") or hybrid action- romance picture ("Titanic"), it's
usually bent in the historical epic direction.
Your Pal-o
-Bazooka Chris Stangl
Subj: BoardRoom: Mark funny
From: adam@avalon.net (Adam Burton)
Time: Wed, 29-Dec-1999 22:39:10 GMT IP: 128.255.95.154
I heard a story about Mark. It may have been twisted over time
by the effectus grapevinius, but here's how it was told to me:
Mark went to visit a friend of his. She said to him, "I've been
very sick for the last few days. I hope you don't contract
anything."
And Mark replied, "I will not."
(It may take a second, but I assure you, it's funny.)
(Or maybe I'm just a geek. I have told this to several people,
and some of them have just stared at me like "buh?!??")
Subj: BoardRoom: re: the movies
From: jerkypnut@aol.com (Adam Hahn)
Time: Thu, 30-Dec-1999 02:14:49 GMT IP: 152.163.206.178
I have to step in, though I have yet to see the movie myself,
to defend Kehry's Oscar pic.
The evidence:
1. Qouth the Stangl, "the Academy nearly invarably prefers
historical epics for the last thirty years." While it might not
technically qualify as a "historical epic", "The Green Mile" is
set in the thirties (I think, but I read that book a long time
ago) and it is three hours long. That probably will make it the
most historical-esque, epic-y movie within range of nominations.
2. Tom Hanks
[Skip back to November 1999 /
Return to Boardroom index /
Skip ahead to January 2000]